Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Applied
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: ODF 1.0 (second edition)
    • Fix Version/s: ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Proposal:
      Correct: "The value means that no hierarchy should be applied at all." to "The value -1 means that no hierarchy should be applied at all."
    • Resolution:
      Hide
      8.8.4 Used Hierarchy
      Replace:
      "The value means that no hierarchy should be applied at all."
      with:
      "The value -1 means no hierarchy should be applied at all."
      Show
      8.8.4 Used Hierarchy Replace: "The value means that no hierarchy should be applied at all." with: "The value -1 means no hierarchy should be applied at all."

      Description

      Transcribed from http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1078.htm

      Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
      DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-26

      QUALIFIERM error

      REFERENCES IN DOCUMENT "Used Hierarchy" in Clause 8.8.4

      NATURE OF DEFECT "The value means that no hierarchy should be applied at all." does not make sense.

      SOLUTION PROPOSED BY THE SUBMITTER Insert "-1" between "value" and "means".

        Activity

        Hide
        Dennis Hamilton added a comment -
        This is Public Comment Registry #265. It also appears as OFFICE-1006 and OFFICE-893

        It duplicates Public Comment Registry #219

        This defect occurs in ODF 1.0 through ODF 1.1

        The schema for ODF 1.1 and earlier provided "-1" as the default value for the optional table:used-hierarchy attribute.

        In ODF 1.2 Part 1 cd02 section 17.747, the statement with the omission has been removed and not replaced. The statement should be restored to the text, with the recommended correction.

        There is an editorial item on the fact that the presence of any other value for this attribute is implementation-defined ("specified by an external component"). The JIRA issue for this Editors Note does not show up in any obvious searches.
        Show
        Dennis Hamilton added a comment - This is Public Comment Registry #265. It also appears as OFFICE-1006 and OFFICE-893 It duplicates Public Comment Registry #219 This defect occurs in ODF 1.0 through ODF 1.1 The schema for ODF 1.1 and earlier provided "-1" as the default value for the optional table:used-hierarchy attribute. In ODF 1.2 Part 1 cd02 section 17.747, the statement with the omission has been removed and not replaced. The statement should be restored to the text, with the recommended correction. There is an editorial item on the fact that the presence of any other value for this attribute is implementation-defined ("specified by an external component"). The JIRA issue for this Editors Note does not show up in any obvious searches.
        Hide
        Patrick Durusau added a comment -
        Proposal filed.
        Show
        Patrick Durusau added a comment - Proposal filed.
        Hide
        Svante Schubert added a comment -
        @Dennis:
        In your summary of the review of the errata document you wrote:
        "May be another place for implementation dependency also, though implicit "
        This leaves room for interpretation. Under the assumption you meant that as -1 was not given the functionality can only be assumed as implementation-dependent. I would still keep the proposed fix as the corrected value is the default value.

        Therefore I suggest to stay with the proposal and react when ISO desires a different solution.
        Show
        Svante Schubert added a comment - @Dennis: In your summary of the review of the errata document you wrote: "May be another place for implementation dependency also, though implicit " This leaves room for interpretation. Under the assumption you meant that as -1 was not given the functionality can only be assumed as implementation-dependent. I would still keep the proposed fix as the corrected value is the default value. Therefore I suggest to stay with the proposal and react when ISO desires a different solution.
        Hide
        Dennis Hamilton added a comment -
        Errata 02 - ODF 1.2 Reconciliation:
          The explicit default value and its interpretation are provided in ODF 1.2 (twice).
        Show
        Dennis Hamilton added a comment - Errata 02 - ODF 1.2 Reconciliation:   The explicit default value and its interpretation are provided in ODF 1.2 (twice).

          People

          • Assignee:
            Svante Schubert
            Reporter:
            Robert Weir
          • Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: