[#OFFICE-1827] ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-36

OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-36

Created: 28/May/09 04:24 PM Updated: 19/Nov/10 08:25 PM

Component/s:

None

Affects Version/s:

ODF 1.0 (second edition), ODF 1.1, ODF 1.2

Fix Version/s:

ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5

Proposal:	Replace: chart:axis-interval-major and chart:axis-interval-minor with chart:interval-major and chart:interval-minor
Resolution:	« Hide 15.31.4 Tick Marks Replace: "chart:axis-interval-major" with "chart:interval-major" and replace "chart:axis-interval-minor" with "chart:interval-minor". Show » 15.31.4 Tick Marks Replace: "chart:axis-interval-major" with "chart:interval-major" and replace "chart:axis-interval-minor" with "chart:interval-minor".

Sub-Tasks:

All

Open

Sub-Task Progress:

ODF 1.1 Errata 01 must compensate for chart:interval-minor bugs in ODF 1.0 and Errata 01-02.

Open

Dennis Hamilton

Description

« Hide

Transcribed from http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1078.htm

Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-36

QUALIFIER error

REFERENCES IN DOCUMENT Clause 15.31.4

NATURE OF DEFECT Two attribute names in 15.31.4 are incorrect. The schema has

attribute chart:interval-major { double }?,

attribute chart:interval-minor { positiveInteger }?

while the prose mentions the chart:axis-interval-major attribute and the chart:axis-interval-minor attribute.

SOLUTION PROPOSED BY THE SUBMITTER

All

Comments

Change History

Sort Order:

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Robert Weir added a comment - 28/May/09 04:38 PM

On 4/27/09 the TC agreed: "Fix for Errata 02, and confirm fixed in ODF 1.2"

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Dennis Hamilton added a comment - 29/Jun/09 09:35 AM - edited

This is Public Comment Registry entry #320

This issue does not show up under the JIRA defect -report query for some reason.

UPDATE: Once I commented, it did show up in the query result. Curious.

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Patrick Durusau added a comment - 06/Jul/09 02:11 PM

Proposal filed.

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Patrick Durusau added a comment - 11/Jul/09 01:38 PM

This error does not exist in the current draft of ODF 1.2. Updated the editions to be fixed.

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Dennis Hamilton added a comment - 19/Nov/10 08:25 PM

Errata 02 - ODF 1.2 Reconciliation:
   The separate section on Tick Marks does not occur in ODF 1.2.
   In addition, the ODF 1.2 descriptions of the individual tich-mark attributes (sections 20.59 chart:tick-marks-major-inner to 20.62 chart:tick-marks-minor-outer all refer to chart-interval-major but there is reference to chart:interval-minor-divisor in 20.61 and 20.62 rather than the chart:interval-minor mentioned introduced in Errata 02.

   * * * *

  The problem is that the ODF 1.0 and IS 26300 texts describe chart:interval-minor-divisor, but the schemas define attribute chart:interval-minor. In ODF 1.0 Errata 01, the text was modified to replace mentions of chart:interval-minor-divisor with chart:interval-minor, aligning with what the schema provides.
  In ODF 1.2, the chart:interval-minor-divisor is retained and the schema defines chart:interval-minor-divisor, not chart:interval-minor.
  In ODF 1.1, the schema and the text use chart:interval-minor-divisor throughout and the use of chart:interval-minor in the schema is reported as an error that was corrected in the production of ODF 1.1 from ODF 1.0.

So what we have are incompatible changes between Errata 01+02 and ODF 1.1+1.2. Presumably we now also have the incompatible changes perpetuated in IS 26300 by virtue of COR1 and the soon-to-be-perpetuated COR2. All of these preserve chart:interval-minor as the schema value.

ON PRINCIPLE, it is clear that the consistent use of chart:interval-minor-divisor is the correct approach, based on the definition of the attribute and its relationship to chart:interval-major.

    * * * * *

RECOMMENDATION: There is nothing that is needed in ODF 1.2

When we create Errata 01 for ODF 1.1, we should not apply the Errata 01 changes for ODF 1.0 15.31.3 that change chart:interval-minor-divisor to chart:interval-minor. We should not apply the change of Errata 02 that changes chart:axis-interval-minor to chart:interval-minor and instead just make sure that any chart:axis-interval-minor is changed to chart-interval-minor-divisor.

Finally, when the IS 26300/AMD is created for alignment with ODF 1.1, we will need to change all chart:interval-minor to chart:interval-minor-divisor in the text and in the relevant schema fragment.

[ Show » ]

Dennis Hamilton added a comment - 19/Nov/10 08:25 PM Errata 02 - ODF 1.2 Reconciliation: The separate section on Tick Marks does not occur in ODF 1.2. In addition, the ODF 1.2 descriptions of the individual tich-mark attributes (sections 20.59 chart:tick-marks-major-inner to 20.62 chart:tick-marks-minor-outer all refer to chart-interval-major but there is reference to chart:interval-minor-divisor in 20.61 and 20.62 rather than the chart:interval-minor mentioned introduced in Errata 02. * * * * The problem is that the ODF 1.0 and IS 26300 texts describe chart:interval-minor-divisor, but the schemas define attribute chart:interval-minor. In ODF 1.0 Errata 01, the text was modified to replace mentions of chart:interval-minor-divisor with chart:interval-minor, aligning with what the schema provides. In ODF 1.2, the chart:interval-minor-divisor is retained and the schema defines chart:interval-minor-divisor, not chart:interval-minor. In ODF 1.1, the schema and the text use chart:interval-minor-divisor throughout and the use of chart:interval-minor in the schema is reported as an error that was corrected in the production of ODF 1.1 from ODF 1.0. So what we have are incompatible changes between Errata 01+02 and ODF 1.1+1.2. Presumably we now also have the incompatible changes perpetuated in IS 26300 by virtue of COR1 and the soon-to-be-perpetuated COR2. All of these preserve chart:interval-minor as the schema value. ON PRINCIPLE, it is clear that the consistent use of chart:interval-minor-divisor is the correct approach, based on the definition of the attribute and its relationship to chart:interval-major. * * * * * RECOMMENDATION: There is nothing that is needed in ODF 1.2 When we create Errata 01 for ODF 1.1, we should not apply the Errata 01 changes for ODF 1.0 15.31.3 that change chart:interval-minor-divisor to chart:interval-minor. We should not apply the change of Errata 02 that changes chart:axis-interval-minor to chart:interval-minor and instead just make sure that any chart:axis-interval-minor is changed to chart-interval-minor-divisor. Finally, when the IS 26300/AMD is created for alignment with ODF 1.1, we will need to change all chart:interval-minor to chart:interval-minor-divisor in the text and in the relevant schema fragment.