|
[
Permalink
| « Hide
]
Patrick Durusau added a comment - 06/Jul/09 01:11 PM
May need to alter to the prose to say: "...that are anchored in a table..." Comments/suggestions?
I believe it would be much clearer and specific to say "The <table:shapes> element contains all of the drawings shapes elements (9.2) for those graphical shapes that are anchored on the table where the <table:shapes> element occurs."
[I confess that I found the original statement more precise, no matter how difficult to parse, than the proposed repair. The repair uses indefinite articles where definite articles and pronouns work better.] Dennis, I overtook your idea of the section reference for graphic shapes. Neglected the wording of drawing shapes as the aside of the "draw" prefix elements also <dr3d:scene> is allowed.
I think we're doing better now. I wonder if part of the problem for the submitter of the defect report has to do with "anchored." I'm not sure that is explained. Will have to look through ODF 1.0 and see.
Errata 02 - ODF 1.2 Reconciliation. The wording used in resolution of this issue is used in ODF 1.2.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||