Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: CMIS-154
Type: Bug Bug
Status: Closed Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: Major Major
Assignee: Unassigned
Reporter: Ryan McVeigh
Watchers: 0
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
OASIS Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) TC

Schema inconsistent with spec in several places.

Created: 21/Apr/09 07:15 PM   Updated: 11/Jan/10 07:14 PM
Component/s: Schema
Affects Version/s: Draft 0.61, Draft 0.62
Fix Version/s: Draft 0.62

Proposal:
Bring the Schema in line with the spec, or vice versa.

clarify defaultValue is on the propertytype specific in the xsd documentation


 Description  « Hide
Part 1 (2.7.3.2) table for "Attributes common to ALL Object-Type Property Definitions" should be consistent w/ CMIS-Core.xsd cmisPropertyDefinitionType (line 772)
   1. table lists defaultValue as an attribute for property definitions, but it is not in the schema
   2. schema defines package, but it's not in the table

Part 1 (2.7.4.1.2) - the table for "Document Object-Type Property Definitions" should match the properties in CMIS-Core enumPropertiesDocument (line 160)
   1. table has properties isLatestVersion and isMajorVersion, but these are IsLatestVersion and IsMajorVersion (capital I) in the schema (emumPropertiesDocument).
   2. table is missing the following properties which are defined in the schema (emumPropertiesDocument): BaseTypeId, IsLatestMajorVersion, ContentStreamAllowed.

Part 1 (2.7.4.3.2) - the table "Relationship Object-Type Property Definitions" should match CMIS-Core.xsd emumPropertiesRelationship (line 205)
   1. table is missing Name prop def defined in schema (line 207)

Part 1 (2.7.4.4.2) - the table "Policy Object-Type Property Definitions" should match CMIS-Core.xsd enumPropertiesPolicy (line 221)
   1. table is missing the property Name which is in the schema (emumPropertiesPolicy line 223)

 All   Comments   Change History      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Al Brown added a comment - 05/Jan/10 12:37 AM
JIRA Cleanup